About me

Associate Professor Jesper Tække

Aarhus University, School of Communication and Culture

Centre for Internet Studies (CFI)

I am an Associate Professor in Media Studies and Organisational Communication at Aarhus University, School of Communication and Culture. With a robust and interdisciplinary academic background, I hold an MA in Information Studies and Organizational Psychology from Aarhus University and a Ph.D. in Media Sociography from the IT-University of Copenhagen.

Research Interests and Focus

My research primarily explores the intricate relationship between technical communication media and societal structures, with a special focus on the digitalization of society, particularly in relation to social media. Over the past 15 years, my empirical research has been centered mainly on upper secondary education systems. However, my interests also extend to other organizational systems, examining the revolutionary impact of digital media.

Teaching and Course Involvement

An integral part of my role at the university includes teaching courses that delve into complex media theories and their societal implications. Notably, I instruct the course “Medie, kultur, og videnskabsteori I and II,” which offers deep insights into media culture and the theory of science, underlining my commitment to shaping critical and analytical thinkers in the field.

Key Projects and Collaborations

Together with Michael Paulsen, I have led three significant research projects: the Socio Media Education experiment, the BIT-project, and the DUFA-project. Additionally, my collaboration with Jakob Linaa Jensen has resulted in the publication of two influential books on social media.

Publications and Academic Contributions

I have authored numerous books and papers. A highlight of my publications is an English book from 2022, which encapsulates our research findings and is available online for free here. My theoretical work primarily revolves around Medium Theory and communication sociological systems theory, particularly influenced by Niklas Luhmann. To name two publications that develop theory for contemporary society (otherwise, see the publication list):

  • Tække, J. (2022). “Materiality and Autonomy Big Data in the Education System.” Cybernetics & Human Knowing, Vol.29(3), pp.121-140.
  • Tække, J. (2022). “Algorithmic Differentiation of Society – a Luhmann Perspective on the Societal Impact of Digital Media.” Journal of Sociocybernetics, Vol. 18 No. 1 (2022). Read here.

Recent and Upcoming Work

My recent contributions include a 2021 book on organizational culture. In 2023, my research will pivot towards analyzing the Anthropocene from a systems- and media-sociological perspective, interpreting society as a sociotechnical autopoiesis machine that has been shaping human interaction since the emergence of articulated language in the Pleistocene (see the publication list).

Conference Participation and Media Presence

I have actively participated in numerous conferences, including delivering a keynote presentation at the 7th ISEKI-Food Conference on “Digitalization of Education – The Theory of the Three Waves.” My work has also garnered media attention, and I have provided expert opinions and insights on various platforms.

Learn more about my research and publications.



Keynote Presentation at the 7th ISEKI-Food Conference: “Digitalization of Education – The Theory of the Three Waves”

I recently had the privilege of delivering a keynote presentation at the esteemed 7th ISEKI-Food Conference. My talk, titled “Digitalization of Education – The Theory of the Three Waves,” delved into the ongoing media revolution and its transformative impact on education and social structures.

Synopsis of the Keynote:

We are currently experiencing a significant shift in how digital media shapes our social world, necessitating adaptations across all sectors, particularly education. Traditional approaches are becoming obsolete in the face of new digital information and interaction paradigms. The education system often struggles to respond effectively, either by restricting digital media usage or overlooking its significance. My keynote addressed this gap by introducing an empirically based theory on the evolution of classroom teaching in the digital era.

The Three Waves of Classroom Transformation:

  1. First Wave: The initial phase involves opening up the traditional classroom, which presents challenges such as student distraction and teacher adaptation to digital media.
  2. Second Wave: Focus shifts to enhancing educational interactions between teachers and students through social media.
  3. Third Wave: This advanced stage sees the successful integration of external parties like authors, researchers, and AI systems into the educational process, fundamentally transforming traditional educational settings.

I emphasized the importance of moving beyond a mere competency-based approach. In our digital era, it’s crucial to foster critical-thinking, autonomous citizens who can assume social responsibility. The keynote highlighted the need for an educational framework that embraces “Bildung,” a concept encompassing personal and cultural maturation, to prepare individuals for the challenges of a digitalized society.

This presentation was a cornerstone at the 7th ISEKI-Food Conference, contributing to the broader dialogue on digitalization’s role in shaping future education systems. The insights provided were aimed at educators, policymakers, and academic professionals seeking to understand and navigate the complexities of digital media in education.

For more details about the conference and other sessions, visit the ISEKI-Food Conference website.

The theory of the three waves.

The theory of the three waves describes the general patterns of how schools respond to the new conditions digital media implies compared to the media situation before the Internet. We propose that these responses imply a shift from closed classroom teaching to an open community between students, teachers and third parts. Yet, the shift does not happen at once. Rather we suggest that it arises through three waves containing different educational responses to the new situation. In Figure 1 we have outlined our narrative theory. On the Y-axis we have educational relevantattentionand on the X-axis we have time. In our theory we assume that before the digital media there was a given level of educational relevant attention. This assumption can be called into question insofar attention toward the educational relevant subject matter differed from student to student, class to class, time to time, etc. Yet, there is no doubt that what we generally observe in the first waveof digital media and wireless networks is a huge drop in educational relevant attention.  Also we know that activity irrelevant to the educational purposes (e.g. responding to private messages) significantly harm grade, recalling of information and note taking.

In our research from 2005-2015 we have observed that the first respond by teachers and schools to the new media situation is primarily either to ignorethe new difficulties and possibilities, or to prohibitthe use of digital media for educational irrelevant purposes. Both strategies – prohibition and ignorance – generally fail for several reasons (ibid). At the same time the new possibilities for teaching provided are not actualised or invented. In the first wave we consequently do not observe a realisation of new and improved teaching, but a destabilised teaching with students trying to multitask between computer games or social media and the educational interaction with teachers that do not know what to do.

The second wave arises when schools, teachers and students begins to make use of the possibilities of the new media for making better interaction between the students and the teachers. In this phase teachers begin to use the new media to draw attention back to the classroom by using digital based written interaction within the class and shared online documents where students collaborate monitored and guided by the teacher. The result is an intensified educational interaction where the attention is re-conquered and more and better possibilities of participationarise. For instance it becomes possible for teachers to get answers from allthe students simultaneouslythrough the use of microblogging media like Twitter, instead of only hearing one voice at a time. This – and similar uses – helps to get more students involved and engaged in the educational interaction. Despite the positive impact of the second wave it only consists of “more” and “better” interaction, not altering the classroom setting and the educational form radically. Yet the third wave– which is truly radical – is made possible by the digital literacy developed and prepared during the second wave.

The third wave arises when other persons than the students and the teachers through the Internet become integral parts of the educational interaction. When this happens on a regular basis it changes the educational form that has existed more or less since the printing press. Instead of a closed system of interaction between teachers and students we now observe an open system of interaction, in which other persons outside the classroom participate and contribute. This brings new perspectivesto the form of education. On regular basis students meet persons with other perspectives, views and responses and the teacher becomes a ‘mediator of otherness’. In this wave the teacher build networks for educational proposes outside the classroom. Students connect to groups, other school classes, individuals and databases using the new medium environment as a natural part of their education. They are taking part in the convergence culture doing produsage, learning to navigate and take part in the new society and its forms of production, network, communications and cultures. The upshot is that teaching shift from being a closed fabricto an open activity, inviting different people to participate. Instead of transmitting knowledge to the students the role of the teacher becomes to connect students with relevant otherness and make knowledge production possible across borders and differences.

In the first phase teachers and schools have to find middle ways in-between extreme versions of prohibitions and ignorance. This leads to the second phase: the use of digital media for educational purposes and what we call the “intensified classroom”. Yet it does not totally solve or repeal the distractions of the first wave, rather it deals with it more adequately. Further the digital skills, experiences and competences achieved through the second phase enableand motivate the class to enter the final and third wave, where other persons than the students and their teachers are contacted with the aim of contributing to the educational process. These alterations are both more practical and fundamental than shifts in learning theory. What we propose is not only a model of shifting learning theories and not only a theory of distance education pedagogy, but rather a general educational theory of how the practice of education as suchalters in the era of digital media, also accounting for the non-digital-elements of education.

Figure 1. The three waves of digital media in education

As part of our research leading to our theory of the three waves we have conducted a three year long action research project, the Socio Media Education (SME) experiment from 2011-2014. The empirical findings in this project enable us to go more into detail and outline more concretely each of the three waves, but also difficulties of moving from phase one to phase two and from phase two to the third. In that project we followed an upper secondary school class and designed the teaching of it together with its teachers to try to provide the teachers and students with some good media habits, a higher level of reflectivity in relation to media use and attention.

To read more see: Digitalisation of education : the theory of the three waves



I am affiliated with The Centre for Internet Research. I am also a member of The Association of Danish Media Researchers (SMID), International Sociological Association (ISA), Research Committee 51 on Sociocybernetics (RC 51) and Media Ecology Association (MEA),  Nordic Media and Communication Research (NORDICOM ), Nordic Sociological Association (NSA),  and Association of Internet Researchers (AIR)